³ÉÈËÖ±²¥

Resources for Validation and Review

The document Guidance Notes for Programme Teams involved in validation and review provides a comprehensive overview of the process. 

³ÉÈËÖ±²¥'s procedures for validation and review are set out in full in the Quality Assurance Handbook - Programme Development, Monitoring and Review Procedures for setting up a new collaborative programme are broadly the same as for other programmes but see the Academic Collaboration section for details. 

For advice on all aspects of validation and review at ³ÉÈËÖ±²¥, including thematic and professional services review, please contact Dawn Martin Assistant Secretary, Governance and Quality Enhancement.

For advice on collaborative programme development, validation and review, please contact Sheila Adamson, Partnership Development Manager.

Templates

Our templates for Validation and Review are under review (July 2025). We will publish updated versions in time for the academic year 2025-26. In the meantime, please contact Governance and Quality Enhancement for the current version.

Panel checklists

Our checklists are under review (July 2025). We will publish updated versions in time for the academic year 2025-26. In the meantime, please contact Governance and Quality Enhancement for the current version.

Please note that we use a slightly different version of the checklist for our franchised collaborative provision. The event Secretary from Governance and Quality Enhancement will provide guidance relevant to each event.  

Internal reference points

External reference points

Thematic and Professional Services Review

³ÉÈËÖ±²¥ undertakes periodic thematic and professional services reviews. The format of these is flexible, depending on the area(s) and themes to be covered. The process for this type of review mirrors the academic review process. It is therefore a three stage process as follows: 1) submission of a Reflective Document; 2) a series of meetings with a Panel comprising staff and student representation; and 3) follow up action in response to recommendations. The following publication provides further information and guidance:

³ÉÈËÖ±²¥ guidelines for thematic and professional services review

Contact the Quality Team